Posted by bellanna on April 19, 2008
Or, more precisely: how it differs from PhD research undertaken in, for instance, the 1990s.
One of the key differences, in my view, is the current abundance of materials, conferences, symposia, blogs, groups, e-journals, mailing lists, and so many other spaces in which critical (and less critical) debates are formed, aired, revisited and critiqued. What should my relation to these materials be? To what extent am I supposed to be aware of the trillions of bites of information flickering past nodes on a daily basis? Does the PhD research contract have a (hidden) section on the time allotted to these quests?
I am not only concerned about the time investment of making sense of this information, of categorising this input into workable chunks with a hierarchical structure. Rather, I am more pensive about being reassured. Assured that I am aware of the key concepts, debates, problems, arguments, and developments in my field of research. That if I fail to include any of these pivotal discussions, I do so out of choice, not out of ignorance.
Rest assured this is only a thought-in-passing; in no way do I suffer from feelings of incapability or self-doubt. At least not to any inhibiting degree. Moreover, I have not even officially started my research. Thus, these thoughts may be swiftly undermined, surpassed and dissolved within a very short time-span. If not, I’ll be sure to address them.
Posted in Notes | Tagged: abundance, materials, PhD | Leave a Comment »
Posted by bellanna on April 19, 2008
It happens more and more often that I encounter a deep reluctance to virtually any type of technologically mediated, computer-based communication- or teaching structure in academia. Let me just state that I am not speaking about academia as a monstrously generalised heavy-weight; I actually do have a certain department in mind. The details as to which one is quite irrelevant, as I have the impression this reluctance can be found across the board.
While this state of technophobia may seem harmless, or even quaintly old-fashioned, I actually find the implications somewhat worrying. I believe that certain departments or sections could hugely benefit from the use of, for instance, e-learning environments, personal websites (up-to-date ones, I mean), group spaces, and others. Generally, these suggestions are met with a disinterested glance, to be soon followed by “sure it’s a good idea, but I have no idea how to use that stuff. It’s different for you ’cause you’re a bit of a nerd, anyway”. Regardless of the question of whether I tick the ‘nerd box’ or not, I find it striking that some people find it acceptable and justifiable that they failed to check their email for more than two weeks, simply because they didn’t know they could access their inbox via the web, without even wondering if a solution to retrieve and read their email could be found. They don’t even take the time or the effort to ask. Actually, when they do ask they don’t want to hear the answer if it appears even vaguely technological. If it entails more than two mouse-clicks it’s too tricky.
I believe that the introduction of certain computer-mediated features may greatly aid the functioning of some departments. Just think of how many processes could be infinitely sped up if people were to actually update their personal websites: no more emailing back and forth about lists of publications, research proposals, telephone numbers, etcetera. But maybe people actually enjoy this slowness. Why make things easy when they can be hard?
Posted in Notes | Tagged: academia, e-learning, nerd, technophobia | Leave a Comment »